Nauka+Praksa
Sign in
Issue image

More articles from Volume 15, Issue 1, 2012

OCENJIVANJE EKONOMSKOG KVALITETA ZGRADA NOVOM TRANSPARENTNOM METODOM - „OPEN HOUSE“

INDUSTRIAL CLUSTERS: MAIN CRANK MECHANISM IN IMPROVEMENT OF COMPETITIVENSS IN INDUSTRY

ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORKING OF SMEs INTO ECO-INDUSTRIAL CLUSTERS

COST AKCIJA KAO VID POVEZIVANJA NAUČNIH ORGANIZACIJA U KLASTER

AMBASSADORS OF THE ENVIRONMENT BIO MECHANICAL TREATMENT OF SOLID COMMUNAL WASTE “THE GIFT THAT LASTS FOREVER“ (ECONOMY-ECOLOGY-ENERGY)

LITERATURE REVIEW OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND RTC THEORYAND APPLICATION IN REGIONAL CHAMBER OF ECONOMY

Aleksandar Popovic
Aleksandar Popovic
View authors publications

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar

Published: 13.09.2012.

Volume 15, Issue 1 (2012)

pp. 131-142;

https://doi.org/10.62683/nip15.131-142

Abstract

Change is modus operandi in modern times and it will be even more so in the future. RTC is normal having in mind that positions of stakeholders are to be disturbed, but there are numerous other reasons for RTC, but real question is how to deal with it. In this paper we will examine change and RTC happening in Regional Chamber of Economy in Nis, Serbia. These changes were inducted by transition of Serbia and its economy during past decades, but also by legislative reform in this sector. Relevant literature was investigated having in mind similirarities and differences with current examples in order to find out what is change and what is RTC, why does it happen and how to deal with it. As a conclusion,the guide - a practical modelwith check-list for change implementation and dealing with RTC was crafted. This model was developed with respect of existing change models and guides.

Keywords

regional,

chamber

References

Atkinson, P., Management, & Services. (n.d.). Managing resistance to change. 14–19.
Buono, A., & Kerber, K. (2009). The Challenge of Organizational Change:Enhancing Organizational Change Capacity. Revue of the Sciences de Gestion, 99–118.
(2009). Business Process Reengineering. Management Services, 38–43.
Resistance To Change: The Rest Of The Story. (n.d.).
Ford, D. (2008). 2, 362–377.
Fugate, M. (2008). Employee Coping With Organizational Change: An Examination Of Alternative Theoretical Perspectives And Models. Personnel Psychology, 1–36.
Learning in Action: A Guide to Putting the Learning Organization to Work. (2000).
Managing People in Organizations. (2002).
Change, I., & Jick, T. (1991). 9, 191–114.
Kotter, J. (n.d.). Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fall. Harvard Business Review, 59–67.
Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method, and reality in social sciences, social equilibria, and social change, Lewin, K., Human Relations, 1, 1947. (2012). Nauka + Praksa, 5–41.
Mabin, V. (2001). Harnessing Resistance: Using the Theory of Constraints to Assist Change Management. European Industrial Training, 2–4.
Mathews, J. (2009). Models of Change Management: A Reanalysis. The Icfai University Journal of Business Strategy, 2, 7–17.
Mento, A. (2002). A change management process: Grounded in both theory and practice. Journal of Change Management, 1, 45–59.
Rethinking Resistance and Recognizing Ambivalence: A Multidimensional View of Attitudes toward an Organizational Change. (2000). Piderit, S. K., Academy of Management Review, 4, 783–794.
Sherman, S., & Garland, E. (2007). Sam Advanced Management Journal, 52–62.
Szamosi, T. (2006). Understanding Employee Readiness to Change in EU Accession Countries The Case of. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 6, 159–169.
Szamosi, T., & Duxbury, L. (2001). Development of a measure to assess organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2, 184–201.
Szamosi, T., & Duxbury, L. (2006). Development of a Model of Resistance to Change. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 1, 21–29.

Citation

Copyright

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles